Ice Hockey Rules Simplified

Ice Hockey Rules Simplified Über dieses Produkt

The book includes: The Rules of Hockey Simplified - The Most Recent NHL Changes - What to Look For During Play - Statistics Explained - League and Playoff. Learn the skills of ice hockey in a new way that is simplified and easy to understand handling the stick in ice hockey has been explained in a way that a beginner. prospectus, the management regulations, the simplified prospectus [. the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) and its national member associations and [. Ice Hard Hockey Coloring Pictures | NHL Hockey West| Ice Hockey | Free here is a brief and simple guide to the basic ice hockey rules, equipment, and terms. Basic Rules of NHL Hockey: A Visual Guide. This basic guide for rules in the NHL covers everything from the field of play to stoppages and penalties.

Ice Hockey Rules Simplified

Ice Hockey If you're new to the game, here is a brief and simple guide to the basic ice hockey rules, equipment, and terms. Samantha ScottRandom Stuff. Ice Hockey Made Simple: A Spectator's Guide [Spectator Guide Series] by Ominsky, The book includes: The Rules of Football Simplified - What to Look For. Bravery is internal and not dependent on the actions of another as it would be in football or cricket or ice hockey or rugby. The probabilities of winning or losing. Basic Rules of NHL Hockey: A Visual Guide. This basic guide for rules in the NHL covers everything from the field of play to stoppages and penalties. ZAMBONI. Nicklas Bäckström Eishockey, Russisch, Hockeyspieler, Nhl, Zukünftiger here is a brief and simple guide to the basic ice hockey rules, equipment, and terms. Canadian ice hockey player Andy Moog goalkeeper for the Boston Bruins guards the net during a game April Ice Hockey PlayersIce Hockey. Hit the ice with tutorials and tips on the rules of hockey as well as information on NHL teams and players. Understand the meaning of hockey statistics and get. Hockey♥ Boston Bruins Hockey, Usa Hockey, Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey, Hockey Teams, Knights HockeyHockey LogosNhl LogosSports LogosHockey RulesKnight Mercedes Benz Arena Berlin, Gopro, Regie, Moment, Shots, Ice Hockey, EISHOCKEY STADT MANNHEIM | Herren Basic T-Shirt - In vielen Größen.

In ice hockey, a penalty results in a player spending time in the penalty box. Ice hockey has three types of penalties: minor, major, and misconduct.

The harsher the penalty, the harsher the punishment. Hockey penalties include:. Butt ending: When a player jabs an opponent with the top end of his stick.

Checking from behind: Whistled when a player hits an opponent who is not aware of the impending contact from behind and therefore cannot defend himself.

Cross checking: When a player makes a check with both hands on the stick. Fighting: Called fisticuffs in the National Hockey League rule book, it is assessed when players drop their gloves and throw punches at each other.

Interference: When a player interferes with or impedes the progress of an opponent who does not have the puck. Roughing: Called when a player strikes another opponent in a minor altercation that the referee determines is not worthy of a major penalty.

Spearing: When a player stabs at an opponent with the blade of his stick, whether he makes contact or not.

An ice hockey team is made up of six players, each with a specific position and job. The job of offense is to score goals, and the defense is there to protect the goal.

The following list describes each of the hockey positions:. Good goalies win championships. Defensemen: A team at full strength has two — one on the left side and another on the right.

Nowadays, there are three primary kinds of defensemen. One is creative and offensive-minded; he likes to handle the puck and lead the team up ice, but is not too physical.

And there are those rare athletes who are a combination of the two. Right wing: He works the right side of the ice for the most part.

He needs to be a physical player who is good along the boards and in the corner. Left wing: Traditionally a left-handed shot, but the NHL is seeing more right-handers playing this position now, a practice picked up from the Europeans.

All rules in sports are made to keep the game safe and fair. Hitting with a stick, when done unsafely, can cause long term injury. No, the goalie can play the puck behind the net in the trapezoid region.

The corners are restricted areas where only players can play the puck. If a goalie plays the puck in these corner areas, they would be penalized with a minor penalty for delay of game.

Penalty shots are pretty rare in general. A penalty shot can be awarded by a referee if they feel that a clear breakaway with no defensemen between the attacking player and the goal is illegally disrupted by the defense by means of a trip, slash, or any other illegal and penalizable action.

Instead of putting the offending player in the penalty box for their infraction, a penalty shot is awarded.

Checking is the act of taking an opposing player away from the puck by means of body contact. A check is legal as long as the player being checked has the puck or is close enough to immediately play the puck.

It is illegal to hit or check a player that does not have the puck or is not close enough to play the puck. Checking is only allowed on the trunk of the body such as the torso, chest, or shoulder.

Checking below the waist or above the shoulders is illegal. Common penalties for these illegal hits include kneeing, head contact, and roughing. Some of these are automatic major penalties and could result in fines and suspensions.

In recent years, checking from behind has also been redefined. It has been decided that blind side checks that could injure players are not beneficial to the future of the sport.

Although some referees do not call all checks from behind, they do make an effort to penalize players who check from behind in a reckless manner.

In the NHL as well as other hockey leagues, checking is tough to call consistently as every situation is different. One legal hit may be called illegal by a different referee, in a different game.

Some hits that are ruled as a clean and legal check can still cause injury. The sport is rough and players are taught to always know who is around them at all times.

If a player is close enough to the puck, they need to be aware of possible situations where they can be hit. To answer this question, we need to understand the intent or perceived intent of the player involved.

Rules in all sports are to keep each game fair and safe. If ever a player initiates contact intentionally to intimidate or harm an official, they will be ejected from the game.

In most hockey leagues, this ejection is also followed by suspension from future games. League commissioners assess the severity of the offense and determine how long the suspension will last.

In the NHL, there are also fines given to players that are aggressive towards on-ice officials. If contact with an official is accidental, there is no action taken against the team or player involved.

If there is an injury to an official, play is stopped and medical attention is given where needed. Contact with a referee happens in most games as players are always trying to find open ice to move and play.

To keep play in front of them, officials are always moving. Players are constantly keeping track of open ice, puck location, and their offensive or defensive positioning.

Officials movements are often forgotten or not noticed by players as the puck moves around the boards. Officials are allowed to verbally remind players where they are on the ice.

This helps players try to move the puck or direct play away from the referees. Strategically, players often try to use linesmen and referees as barriers to lose defenders chasing them.

This is still not going to cause disciplinary action against players. Officials are trained to place themselves in areas of the ice that will keep them out of the flow of the game more effectively.

NHL games are three 20 minute periods with two intermissions. Each NHL game will have media coverage and therefore media stoppages will occur.

A typical game will take just under 3 hours from start to finish. Games that run longer include at least one of the following: overtime, injuries, broken glass, problems with the ice, or other public safety issues that delay the game.

During the regular season, if there is a tie after the three periods are over, there is a 5 minute overtime period, followed by a shootout. If a regular season game goes to a shootout, the total time for the game could be about 3 hours 30 minutes.

Playoff games that end in a tie will keep playing 20 minute overtime periods until one team scores. This will end the game immediately.

There will be no media timeouts during playoff overtime periods. Clearing a defensive zone is often done by anyone in the zone to a player outside the zone.

This is typically done by the defense to a forward out in the neutral zone. There are times, however, where a defensive player is out of position and would be the target of a clearing pass.

Most rules in all ice hockey leagues will be the same. There will be a few differences based on the bylaws and goals of each league.

In the NHL, icing can be waived off if it seems clear that the offending team would recover the puck before the defensive team.

Most leagues I have played in, or officiated in have "automatic icing" which does not allow the offending team any allowance to prevent the icing.

Also, offsides in the NHL is delayed until a player who is offsides directly influences play or touches the puck before the offsides have been cleared by the linesmen.

In other leagues, there is no delay to offsides. Once a play is considered offsides, play ends until the puck is dropped to resume play.

Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.

Khris - Teams are allowed 6 skaters on the ice at a time as long as they are not fighting off a penalty, or not in over time during the regular season.

These 6 players can either be 5 skaters and a goalie, or 6 skaters. Every team relies heavily on the skills of their goalie. It is only towards the end of the game when a team wants to gamble to try to tie a game.

If a team is losing and they want to try to get a little more offense on the ice, they can pull their goalie and put a forward on the ice.

There is one other time that a team will pull the goalie during the game If a team has committed a penalty, play will continue until that offending team gets control of the puck.

Since getting control of the puck would stop play, the offending team can not shoot towards the goal.

So, since there is no threat to getting scored on, the team that is still allowed to play the puck can pull their goalie and put an extra skater on the ice.

As play continues until the offending team touches the puck, the other team will typically play with 6 players and no goalie.

How ever, this does not mean that the offending team can not get a goal at this time. If a wing passing back to an inattentive defenseman accidentally scores on them selves while their goalie is out of the net, that goal will count even if the team getting the point was about to go into the penalty box.

Does that answer your question? I really hope it helps. Feel free to ask questions. Tripping is indeed in the list. Laz, I am assuming that you mean standings point system and not goal scoring.

I am going to explain standing points if that is ok. NHL standings based on points earned by wins, ties, and losses.

The winning team gets 2 points in the standings. The team that losses gets 0 points. However, it the loss comes only after the end of regulations, such as overtime or a shoot-out, then the team that lost would get 1 point in the standings.

So if I look at the standings and see a team's record , I would know that this team has 15 wins, 3 losses where no overtime was needed, and 8 losses after the end of the 3rd period.

Now comes the fun part. If I am looking at the standings and I see more then one team with 38 points in the standings, how do I know which team should be ranked higher?

There are a series of tie brakes rules to sort teams in the correct order. Every so often, the NHL publishes new rules.

There are occasionally changes to how teams break ties in the standings. The greater number of games won, excluding games won in the Shootout.

This figure is reflected in the ROW column. The greater number of points earned in games between the tied clubs.

If two clubs are tied, and have not played an equal number of home games against each other, points earned in the first game played in the city that had the extra game shall not be included.

If more than two clubs are tied, the higher percentage of available points earned in games among those clubs, and not including any "odd" games, shall be used to determine the standing.

The greater differential between goals for and against for the entire regular season. NOTE: In standings a victory in a shootout counts as one goal for, while a shootout loss counts as one goal against.

I would like to note that for Adult leagues and other non-NHL leagues have different standings points procedures. Such as 3 points for wins, 1 point for ties, and 0 points for regulation losses.

Did this answer your question? Play will not continue until both teams are ready. There are a few "delays" which have been employed by coaches in the past.

But, if a delay is seen as a stall tactic to just allow tired players to catch their breath, the referee may award the delaying player a 2 minute minor for "delay of game.

Some things I have seen include a weak or fragile stick, goalie pads loosening or buckles need to be refastened. I have even seen a play request that a visor be replaced that has been cracked or need drying with a towel.

I even saw one that got called, and I still disagree with the official who awarded a delay of game for this next example. A player lined up to take the face-off.

Tapping the ice with his stick, he felt that the stick was not strong. The referee insisted that there be no further delay. So the player tried proving that his stick needed to be replaced by breaking off the head of his stick in his bare hands.

This really is not easy to do with an undamaged stick. Not impressed, the referee gave him 2 minutes in the penalty box for delaying the face-off longer.

I imagine more was said before the penalty, which drove the referee to an emotional choice to penalize the player.

So in short, players are usually given time to replace gear during the stoppage. But they are not supposed to enter the bench to rest while waiting for the face-off to line up.

Player loses his hockey stick and an icing is called is he allowed to go to the bench to get another stick.

You should also try playing it :. It is so much more fun to be on the ice playing then watching. And I really do love watching. I am not exactly sure I understand the scenario.

So, let me rephrase using Player A, and Player B. So, you want to know that if Player A has the puck, and Player B strips the puck away from Player A, is it tripping if:.

If I missed a case that you wish to have answered, please reply. In cases 1 and 2, I don't think a referee would call a penalty for tripping since there was a play made on the puck.

If anything, I could imagine a referee calling some sort of interference or holding penalty, but Player A being the player who just lost the puck would likely receive no penalties.

Having said that, if in case 3, Player A had the puck, and not only did Player B knock away the puck, but also caused Player A to lose his stick because Player B held it and pulled it from Player A, and then dropped it, causing Player A to trip, In summary, I would be surprised to see a tripping call in any scenario.

I could see other penalties called in general. But there are many plays that are pretty close, and players drop sticks all the time, even if they are forced to by means of slashing, holding, and other means.

Most of the time, as spectators, we see what we believe should have been a penalty, where referees seem to miss, or just plain ignore.

And this brings me to a statement I have said in several other posts; a referee is human and will miss calls, or just want to let players play.

If it would effect the game adversely, then hopefully, they will make the right call. If a player hits the ball away from the other player and then he pulls his stick away from the player and the player trips on his stick after is it a penalty?

Thanks Mr decfcffcefk and Edafddbebdeg. People who wish to write comments to me directly are encouraged post mail to me directly.

It will make it easier for people looking for answers to questions if this ever growing comment section remains reserved for the purpose of questions and answers.

But still, I do appreciate the kind words of those that enjoy this Hub article. I think this is one of the most significant information for me.

And i'm glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent D.

Good job, cheers decfcffcefgk. The shots on goal stat is based around a defensive minded hockey team. The SOG stat is intended for goalies,and to determine a goalies performance.

As it is the opposite in outer sports, where a similar stat would showcase an offensive pressure. Its Stats like shots On goal and goals against average, help the NHL on making their decision on who wins with the vezina Trophy.

Thank you guys for your excellent feed back, as together we can help educate the masses about this awesome sport.. That is a great question.

A passed puck that bounces wrong or icing that takes a bad bounce and gets directed towards the net does not always count as a shot on goal.

Now, NHL players are skilled enough to aim shots off defenders and teammates' skates, backs, legs, pads If a clear shot is not there, I have seen players try a pinball approach.

It is up to the official at the scores' table to count actions like these as a shot or not. Accidental redirections may not be seen as a shot.

But one that gets me are the intentional "shots on goal" from a defender's own blue line as a clearing attempt.

It goes the whole length of the ice to be easily blocked by the goalie on the other half of the ice. This is not a shot on goal, and is not counted as one.

I believe it is not counted because it is technically a clearing attempt put on frame just to prevent icing. So the goalie must stop the puck.

Sure, the shot would have gone in, and I have seen goalies mishandle such easy pucks in the past. As you said, intent does have some say when counting SOG as a stat.

Having said all this, I have not read anywhere that explains any of this. So it could be all opinion and contain no valid weight at all.

But from I have heard and discussed with officials, and other analysts, SOG is a stat for goalie coaches and defense coaches. It is meant to give a team an idea how often they are back on their heals and allowing access to their goalies.

Lucky bounces and clearing attempts are not real pressure on a defense or goalie, so it should not be weighed in on the stat.

I hope this helped. There is no official nhl definition of a shot on goal and other youth hockey parents and I always have the discussion about what constitutes a SOG.

Most often I hear "if the goalie didn't stop the puck then it would have gone in so therefore it counts as a save". I say no all the time.

There is some intent to be determined as well, right? If a short handed team ices the puck off the boards and it ends up being stopped by the goalie of the team on the power play, that's not a SOG.

Can you comment please.. Cross Checking is as you described. However, some penalties are subjective to the judgement of the referee.

Pushing and body checking is legal. A cross check is dangerous, especially when the stick is near the neck or face of a player. Most cross checks get called when a player is being particularly dangerous towards another.

Also, referees may let players get away with one or two, but too many in a row, and they will call it. I understand cross checking as a player hitting another player with the shaft of the stick while holding it with two hands.

Why is it that I see players doing this all the time with no penalty being called? I usually see it around the goal when one player is trying to push the other out of the way.

RJN - I agree that many of the safety inclusions into the rules such as blind side hits, hits to the head, removing helmets during a fight, and stricter boarding fines Fans of the game love seeing good hits, unless it is at the expense of their favorite team's all star players.

All too often, good players are targeted and are injured due to hits that really have no place in the game.

Teams have invested financially in these players. Fans rally behind them too. It only hurts the game to see a temporarily "thrilling" hit which has the potential to end a player's ice hockey career.

About fighting; it is not likely to go away. The CBA and GM meetings have looked into removing fighting, raising fines, or imposing other penalties to on-ice fighting.

It was decided that fighting was part of the traditional hockey foundations and would somehow negatively impact the game if it were to be removed completely.

Seeing this, I don't believe fighting will ever go away On a side note, of all the fights I have seen, most have only issued superficial face bleeding and bruises.

There was one exception this year where two players fell to the ice, and one who removed his helmet had to be rolled off the ice due to hitting his head on the ice when he fell.

The league realignment is still something I have mixed feelings towards. I want to see how the playoffs are influenced by the change.

In the past, only 3 spots were reserved and the rest of the conference would fill in the remaining 5 spots.

Now, with only 2 wild card spots, it seems like there will be a qualified team or two that are left out of the playoffs.

I predict there will be eventual changes to the wildcard conditions. I just removed about 2 paragraphs trying to defend teams that are centered around a single or multiple stars.

Your logic is understandable. Balanced teams acting as a single entity should expect better results then teams focused on an individual. Such player centric teams should expect failure when their focus player is struggling.

Teams like Washington should find ways to get other players and other lines to step up and help the team succeed.

I don't think Washington is hopelessly lost and won't do well. They did just take 5 points from a 3 game California road trip against 3 of the highest scoring home teams in the NHL this year.

And OV scored 1 goal in all of that. But I do get your logic, and I agree that balance is better. I love the new alignment. It seems to have evened the playing field or should I say un-tilted the ice.

I especially love how the west is showing the old school what they are made of. Perhaps the press will adjust their bias somewhat but I am dreaming now.

I am not sure why, but I think the officiating is getting better, more consistent. Perhaps my understanding of the game has grown. Hockey is a team sport, and when you have a star player who is given free reign to play his game, you end up with a player who has star billings and a non-winning team.

Hockey is improving in spite of the "traditions" of the game. Fighting will lose it's place in the game. Even checking is being tailored to reduce brutality in the game.

I recognize now that a lot of old schoolers' will miss this in the game that they love but injury will eventually force brutality out.

No questions here but feel free to opine on any and all perspectives. I love this column and the game even though I live in an out of market area.

Laura - Yes, you have it exactly right. All teams are ordered in the standings based on a quick math formula based off of these three numbers.

There are ever changing tie breaker rules to determine placement in the standings where teams have the same number of points. But the basics of the points are above.

Hi i have a question, they show the results for the games like what does that mean. Is it like wins, loses and overtime loses or is it something else?

At the start of a season, each team can have between 20 and 23 players which include 2 goalies. Players get injured or perform below the needs of the team or coaching standards.

Players that move down to the minor leagues or are injured can be replaced by other players pulled up from minor league farm teams or trades.

However, players especially young or new players are given a 9 game evaluation period early in the season. If these players dress for a 10th game, their first year contract starts which allows them to reach free agency sooner.

Teams would then lose their farm players sooner if they are not careful. The rules in the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which is how trades are governed, player contract allowances and restrictions are defined, and team salary caps among many other things, has many moving parts that change during each lockout.

To be honest, I have not read up enough on all the stipulations from this last CBA negotiations about team trades to and from their farm teams.

All of this said, teams have the flexibility to pull up players in an "emergency situation" such as player injuries at any time.

And a team can only dress 20 to 23 players. How does all that swapping back and forth work? Thanks for explanation on the offsides rule Adhilde.

Well, as simply put as possible. The puck has to be over the blue line offensive zone before any offensive player.

That really is the most simple explanation I can come up with. If the puck comes out of the zone, every one of the offensive players must clear the zone before the puck comes back in.

Now, I don't want to complicate the understanding of the rule, but there are a few acceptations. Such as a defending player bringing the puck in when offensive players are in the zone no offsides.

Also, if a player tries to keep the play onsides, but picks up his foot on the outside of the blue line offsides. I am pretty happy hockey is starting up again here in 2 days.

It is good to have a full season again. Dont know if you still see this thread, but it is awesome! I feel really dumb I kniw the pucj has to get ib there first, but a pkayer will be skaing in awith thrbpuck and grt called offsides The rule is that a goalie is to be protected as much as possible.

I know the helmet is required If a ref does not call play dead, he is putting the goalie at risk. The glove is not as critical.

I don't think I have seen play stopped for a glove. I would imagine the glove may be up to a ref if they feel like stopping play.

But the helmet is a rule, and should have been stopped. If a goaltender loses a glove or helmet during play, is it required for the referee to stop play?

I thought this was a safety issue and was a requirement. Yes, if your stick breaks, you must drop it or be given a 2 minute minor penalty.

If your stick is not broken, you can pick it back up. If a player knocks it out of your hands, if you drop it You are never allowed to throw your stick as a means to interfere with a play where you are too far away, or to try to prevent a scoring opportunity.

I heard if your stick breaks you must drop it. If you drop a good stick you can't pick it up unless you were in the process of shooting or passing.

Is all that true? It sounds like bad luck on your part. That would have been an ESPN worthy highlight.

The one ref likely believed you had thrown your stick, which would have resulted in a minor penalty. I don't see why that would have been a penalty shot.

But, that may just be the rules of your league. The hard part about being a ref is that you have to make the "best" call you can at real speed and in the moment.

Instant replay would probably have shown your stick being knocked out of your hand inadvertently by the goal post.

But the ref had to decide what he thought was right at that moment. The bigger question is; so you stopped the initial goal. Did your goalie make the second save on the penalty shot?

I was playing center and the other team had a breakaway. As I was back checking the other team with the puck the player faked the goalie and send a soft shot around straight toward the net.

I dove forward to reach my stick forward and accross the net to block the shot. As I slid past the goal line along side of the net my stick was parallel with the goal line half in front of the net.

In the same moment the puck bounced off the blade of my stick and out of the goal and the stick came out of my hand as it struck the post.

One ref called "no goal "and the other ref called for a penalty shot. They decided on a penalty shot. What are the rules in this situation?

I clearly did not throw my stick at the puck but it did come out of my hand at the moment of blocking an inevitable goal. And your ironic prediction of getting beat first round of the post season is quite common for Presidents Trophy winners.

There seems to be a curse with owning the best record. Player 1 gets out at His team is still short 2 skaters.

So does he have to wait for a stopage in play to return? Otherwise it would be too many men on the ice. I know that you cant have less than 3 skaters on the ice.

I was just curious how the timing worked. Thank you. Season is half over and no loss. They'll get bounced in the first round. A team will always have the ability to put 3 players and a goalie on the ice, no matter how many players are sitting in the box.

Every player from a given team can sit in the box at the same time and it would not change how many players can skate free. The trick to these situations is to understand how the clock works during such an occurrence.

It once was and there have been some rule changes to this in recent years causing confusion that if more then 2 players from the same team were in the box serving penalties, only 2 of the penalty timers would reduce as the game was being played.

This would result in the third player sitting in the box to have a longer penalty wait time, as he would not see any time reduce from his timer until the first penalty expired.

Player 3 would have sat for instead of only because 2 penalty timers can run at the same time. I will have to confirm this, but that is what I remember.

Just know, you can put more in the box then just 2. What happens when a team has two players in the penalty box and a player on the short handed team commits another penalty?

Let's assume all of these are minor penalties. Go Hawks! Absolutely enjoy the writing you've given the internet.

I have added your site to my bookmarks. Looking forward to your next blog. WebWatcher Now if u want to guest write my site. I typically see a coach move players from one side to another, or one position to another to help that player or line get a spark.

When that fails, often the player gets put back to the minors to build skills again. OV switched from left to right as Oates has been moving lines around.

OV and Backstrom were the dynamic duo for years. Now they are on different lines. Coaches make moves to see how team chemistry can be improved. I played a game last night where the officials did not know some of the rules.

It was ok though since they put their whistles away, and just let us play. But still, there are enough grey areas in hockey at every level.

It is funny to see how many people who know a lot but still do not know everything. I am included in that statement. Thanks for reading Steve.

Thanks this was a good read, I can think of a few people at our local arena who sit near me that could learn from reading this. Maybe one or two of the officials too :.

Opinion is hard to prove, disprove, believe, or disbelieve. You will either agree with me, or want to argue with me.

The beautiful thing about opinions is that I can believe anything, and it should not matter to anyone else, and the inverse is true.

To be fair, and to answer your questions about my opinion, I think Bettman has a hard job. He has to tell hundreds of players and owners combined what the league is going to do, how it is going to protect agreements, contracts, safety, and other concerns that individuals and groups are going to have each year.

If he makes one decision, one portion of the group will approve, and the other will disapprove. The opposite would be true if he decided in favor the other way.

That example pretty much is only in binary yes and no type answers or problems. Now compound that with more "answers" then just Yes or No Bettman has his belief of how the NHL would best prosper, earn money, draw in new fans, and develop future players.

One choice could ruin countless hours of effort whereas sticking to a difficult decision now could create a positive culture in 5 years. I often compare management to parenting.

Decisions are not always popular. And they are not always seen as "the right way" for something to be done. But someone must make that decision.

Not all kids respect their parents. Not every player, coach, owner, and fan respect Bettman. But he is making harder then I have to make.

I am glad it is not me. I can guarantee that I would have countless people mad at me if I were the commissioner of anything. I think hockey is still fun to watch.

He is not doing bad. All sides wanted to be paid fair according to what they believed would be fair. They also wanted to make sure a great many other things as well.

So, Bettman, I am ok with him making hard choices and sticking with them. Fan growth is basically why there was a lockout to begin with.

On to 2; I would not be commissioner, ever. As I mentioned before, there are too many things to protect. So, lets say I make a choice to force salary cuts, or ticket price caps, or new rules to improve safety, or any other element of the game.

As one element changes, it will affect some other area. Change in player pay will cause tickets to go up. Forcing tickets to go down in price will give owners less to pay for high powered players.

Changing rules happen, but they are always years in debate with owners. But these tend to have the least amount of influence to team mechanics.

However, referees tend to have a learning curve to adoption of how new rules are called. But to give you as straight an answer as I can, I would change nothing without knowing more about what is happening under the hood of the league that I do not already know.

The uninformed can always judge based on what they know. But we, the uninformed should always be ready to consider that we don't know enough.

We can have our opinions, but they will always be missing something. They will always be flawed. Again, I am not envious of anyone who has to keep so many groups of people who don't want to work together happy.

Can you briefly explain why every seems to hate him besides the obvious involvement in a pair of lockouts , and how deserved do you think his reputation is?

Welcome back. The shortened season is so young it is hard to comment on a new coach trying to get a team to adopt his system. Oates is one of the most talented capitals in franchise history.

As a fan, I would love to see him be a brilliant coach as well. OV has a very specific skill set. He hits hard, moves fast, and plays how he learned how to play.

I have seen him try different things over the years. Coaches don't always know how to play him. Coaches often have a hard time playing someone on their roster.

I don't think Ovechkin can't learn to play different. I don't think he has not played different. His high power, no hold back attitude is what got him noticed.

That got shut down, and he slowed down. It would be hard for anyone to take their style that got them noticed and be forced to make it better. Isn't that what makes us human?

The ability to adapt to trials, to try to make ourselves better. Sometimes this is harder then it looks. I am not even close enough to pro level to compare myself to even a bench player who spends most of the season in development leagues.

But I know I have no room to judge someone else who can stick handle circles around almost every other player, out hit most other players, and shoot a puck from just about any angle and still make a goalie worry if they are going to stop his shot.

Sure, he does not make headlines like in Phoenix where he scored on his back with the tip of his stick. Sure he has not had back to back 50 goal seasons for a few years.

I still like to watch him score. He gets bad reviews because someone has compared him to other players. He still goes out and does not miss a game.

He plays hard. I don't know anyone who likes to lose. I must respect him because I could not do any better. Is he worth what his team and fans are paying for him to be in Washington?

I don't know. I am glad I don't have to answer that question with a paycheck. But as a fan, I still let my neighbors know when he and any other Capital scores a goal.

I have wondered how many neighbors down can hear my yell when Washington scores. I was last on here 9 months ago I'm back! Great to see you're still answering these, and hope all is well.

So, I'm just getting into the current NHL season. I watched the Penguins-Caps game on Sunday and yes, I am asking yet another question about Washington.

During one of the period breaks, either Jones or Milbury was saying that the reason Ovie has slumped overall is because he doesn't evolve his game; i.

And, 2 What is your assessment of Adam Oates as the coach so far? I know this is a Hockey Basics hub but I'm sure your responses will be enlightening for all, not just Caps fans Thanks for the insight as always!

This article along with nearly every comment up until March has been published for kindle and nook devices. I would love any support from readers who want to keep a copy digitally for themselves.

Players are allowed to be in the crease, as well as play the puck in the crease. The only really big rule about crease violation is that a player can't interfere with the goaltender.

In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.

The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee s , and not by means of video replay or review.

Justin, sorry about the long winded quote from the NHL Rulebook. In short, as it says towards the beginning of the quote, a goal can be allowed even if a player was standing in the crease.

But it will be disallowed if that player caused the goaltender from being able to move freely. On a side note, some other leagues have differing rules.

Such as amateur leagues have a crease violation rule where any opposing player that enters the crease on his own power and not forced by the defense will cause a stoppage of play, and a resulting face-off out in the neutral zone.

This post is in error. It is rule 67 that was altered. Rule 76, Handeling the puck- players who cover the puck with the intent to hide the puck from opposing players will be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.

In addition, if the face off player pushes the puck with his hands to clear the face off circle, this will also be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.

Your logic is dizzying. But if that makes sense to you, I can't argue your belief and your conclusions.

Live long, and prosper, and may the force be with you. As for the "trick" question. I am not sure I am even reading the question right.

What percent of the open net is needed to score? Well, I have seen goals scored in areas that were blocked by the goalie, or from behind the net, and from weird bounces They only part of the goal that needs to be open to the puck is the part of the goal the puck is getting scored into it.

Meaning, of all of the goal mouth opening , they only part that needs to be open is the part just big enough for the puck to pass through. OK trick hockey math related question.

I dont know if u know this but there is a relativity new pro league cwhl 6 teams mostly all canadain but there is 1 team in that league outta Boston.

Chris, Girls can totally rock hockey. I play recreationally these days, and there are not too many girls, but they come out and play in our league just fine.

This season, we have the wife of our team captain on defense, and she has been the most reliable in both positioning and physically challenging the on-coming pressure from our opponents.

I watch every game I can find when it comes to watching hockey. I especially like NHL and International play. Sadly, for women's hockey, that usually means I just get the Olympics and the occasionally televised Women's World Championships.

Sure, they don't hit like players in the NHL do, but they do hit. They also don't skate at the same speed that the NHL is played at. But if that argument were truly a concern, how is it that NCAA men's basketball is popular?

I like NCAA sports too, but anyone who argues that women's hockey of any kind at a semi-professional level is too slow, the I don't want to hear that person say they like any NCAA sport, for it is much slower then it's professional counter part.

A few years ago, my oldest daughter asked if she could learn to play hockey. I was really happy. Then she realized the puck could get her I tried to explain that she would have on pads, and that she would not feel too much of the impact.

She however remembered that I broke my foot 3 times playing hockey by blocking shots. She does not want to play. She likes to watch it still.

But I thought I had something going. How do I feel about girls in hockey? I feel there are not enough leagues and teams fostering our young women.

I would like to see a women's league that gets national attention. The state I live in has a few traveling women's leagues, but no one knows about them.

I would like to see a WNHL, but that seems pretty far off. I totally support anyone anywhere who wants to play hockey.

There should be no reason why anyone can't put a stick in their hand and play. Thank you Chris. I hope you stay with helping your boys and girls teams.

Managing and coaching teams can be a thankless activity. But if just one becomes passionate about hockey, they can spread it to others.

Good luck. Who knows, maybe your son s could be the next hockey all star generation. Oh wow thats crazy! Well thank you again for the info!

Larisa, price always varies based on age and equipment requirements. I would imagine peewee to cost a few hundred dollars as a minimum. You can often find second hand stores to provide gloves, skates and some of the basic pads.

Kids grow out of pads so fast that it may be better to just buy them used at first. New pads could run you anywhere from to , especially as your player gets older.

You will also need a chest pad, knee pads, helmet, elbow pads, gloves, and hockey pants. I don't know the exact cost of youth pads as my children are not as enthusiastic as I am about hockey.

I had to make the conscious choice not to force it. Sigh, I can dream of them in the NHL. But they each have their own hobbies and passions.

At least, I have taught them how to play hockey. They know how to watch it. About the dangers of hockey; every competative contact sport has opportunity for injury.

Hockey allows checking in some leagues, but not all. I have yet to see a checking peewee league.

I am sure there is one out there, but I have not actually seen one. I would recommend if a team does not require a full face cage, get one anyway.

Teeth cost too much to replace as a kid. The dangers in youth hockey would likely be high sticks to the face or neck, stray pucks, blocked shots which is how I have broken my foot , and inexperienced skaters accidentally hitting or skating into other players.

I find that the pads make the game incredibly safe. I have taken shots off my mask, knees, feet, and other pads.

As players start younger, they learn how to avoid danger better. I can't say there will be no risk, but I really think hockey is safer then football.

Collisions do less damage to players then being dragged down in semi-defensless positions. Football is fine, but I really think hockey is safer.

Makes perfect sence now!.. Thank you for your wonderful explanation! My family is all about football i love football Raiders!

Also why is it so dangerous?? Larisa, I was very happy to see LA win last night. They deserved the win after such a strong playoff run. To your questions; a check is the physical use of force or an object to impede the play or progress of another player.

For example, a check can be applied by a player running into another. This is the most typical type of check.

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch Alle anzeigen. Wenn die Familienfreigabe aktiviert ist, können bis zu sechs Sat1games diese App verwenden. Taking a break from jersey designs Uhrzeit Spiele, I thought I'd share my ideal "Hockey Pad", a place to watch hockey, play hockey video games, and just hang out in general. This kids hockey room decor is simple and makes a statement. Das gesuchte Angebot wurde beendet. Preis Gratis.

Ice Hockey Rules Simplified Video

Basic Hockey Rules Ice Hockey Rules Simplified

The referee drops the puck inside the center circle of the neutral zone. One player from each team will position themselves inside the circle.

Players tussle for control of the puck. They do this without touching each other with their sticks or any body parts.

Unlike most sports, general play often occurs behind the goal in ice hockey. That's because the playing area extends up to the perimeter boarding.

Attacking players are not allowed to enter their opponents' defending zone until the puck gets played past the defending line. No player can enter the goalkeeper's crease unless the puck has already passed the line.

The standard goalie position is inside their team's crease. Basic ice hockey rules allow them to use their hands or any other part of their body to keep the puck from entering the goal.

Substitutions take place regularly in ice hockey. The team coach rotates players often to achieve strategic objectives and rest any tired team members.

You cannot win an ice hockey game unless you score goals. Accurate passing and skillful shooting is the best way to place the puck into your challenger's goal.

As a rule, passing the puck along the ice is the best technique. But, when players elevate the puck, they try to make it land flat when it hits the ice.

This tactic makes it easier to receive. Players who commit offenses are temporarily removed from play. The offending player gets placed in the penalty box.

The location for the box is on the sidelines and close to the center line of the rink. One referee and two linesmen officiate the codified ice hockey rules and regulations.

This is a general rule in ice hockey and depends on the league you are playing. The CBA and GM meetings have looked into removing fighting, raising fines, or imposing other penalties to on-ice fighting.

It was decided that fighting was part of the traditional hockey foundations and would somehow negatively impact the game if it were to be removed completely.

Seeing this, I don't believe fighting will ever go away On a side note, of all the fights I have seen, most have only issued superficial face bleeding and bruises.

There was one exception this year where two players fell to the ice, and one who removed his helmet had to be rolled off the ice due to hitting his head on the ice when he fell.

The league realignment is still something I have mixed feelings towards. I want to see how the playoffs are influenced by the change. In the past, only 3 spots were reserved and the rest of the conference would fill in the remaining 5 spots.

Now, with only 2 wild card spots, it seems like there will be a qualified team or two that are left out of the playoffs. I predict there will be eventual changes to the wildcard conditions.

I just removed about 2 paragraphs trying to defend teams that are centered around a single or multiple stars. Your logic is understandable.

Balanced teams acting as a single entity should expect better results then teams focused on an individual.

Such player centric teams should expect failure when their focus player is struggling. Teams like Washington should find ways to get other players and other lines to step up and help the team succeed.

I don't think Washington is hopelessly lost and won't do well. They did just take 5 points from a 3 game California road trip against 3 of the highest scoring home teams in the NHL this year.

And OV scored 1 goal in all of that. But I do get your logic, and I agree that balance is better.

I love the new alignment. It seems to have evened the playing field or should I say un-tilted the ice. I especially love how the west is showing the old school what they are made of.

Perhaps the press will adjust their bias somewhat but I am dreaming now. I am not sure why, but I think the officiating is getting better, more consistent.

Perhaps my understanding of the game has grown. Hockey is a team sport, and when you have a star player who is given free reign to play his game, you end up with a player who has star billings and a non-winning team.

Hockey is improving in spite of the "traditions" of the game. Fighting will lose it's place in the game. Even checking is being tailored to reduce brutality in the game.

I recognize now that a lot of old schoolers' will miss this in the game that they love but injury will eventually force brutality out.

No questions here but feel free to opine on any and all perspectives. I love this column and the game even though I live in an out of market area.

Laura - Yes, you have it exactly right. All teams are ordered in the standings based on a quick math formula based off of these three numbers.

There are ever changing tie breaker rules to determine placement in the standings where teams have the same number of points.

But the basics of the points are above. Hi i have a question, they show the results for the games like what does that mean. Is it like wins, loses and overtime loses or is it something else?

At the start of a season, each team can have between 20 and 23 players which include 2 goalies. Players get injured or perform below the needs of the team or coaching standards.

Players that move down to the minor leagues or are injured can be replaced by other players pulled up from minor league farm teams or trades.

However, players especially young or new players are given a 9 game evaluation period early in the season. If these players dress for a 10th game, their first year contract starts which allows them to reach free agency sooner.

Teams would then lose their farm players sooner if they are not careful. The rules in the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which is how trades are governed, player contract allowances and restrictions are defined, and team salary caps among many other things, has many moving parts that change during each lockout.

To be honest, I have not read up enough on all the stipulations from this last CBA negotiations about team trades to and from their farm teams.

All of this said, teams have the flexibility to pull up players in an "emergency situation" such as player injuries at any time.

And a team can only dress 20 to 23 players. How does all that swapping back and forth work? Thanks for explanation on the offsides rule Adhilde.

Well, as simply put as possible. The puck has to be over the blue line offensive zone before any offensive player. That really is the most simple explanation I can come up with.

If the puck comes out of the zone, every one of the offensive players must clear the zone before the puck comes back in. Now, I don't want to complicate the understanding of the rule, but there are a few acceptations.

Such as a defending player bringing the puck in when offensive players are in the zone no offsides. Also, if a player tries to keep the play onsides, but picks up his foot on the outside of the blue line offsides.

I am pretty happy hockey is starting up again here in 2 days. It is good to have a full season again.

Dont know if you still see this thread, but it is awesome! I feel really dumb I kniw the pucj has to get ib there first, but a pkayer will be skaing in awith thrbpuck and grt called offsides The rule is that a goalie is to be protected as much as possible.

I know the helmet is required If a ref does not call play dead, he is putting the goalie at risk. The glove is not as critical.

I don't think I have seen play stopped for a glove. I would imagine the glove may be up to a ref if they feel like stopping play.

But the helmet is a rule, and should have been stopped. If a goaltender loses a glove or helmet during play, is it required for the referee to stop play?

I thought this was a safety issue and was a requirement. Yes, if your stick breaks, you must drop it or be given a 2 minute minor penalty.

If your stick is not broken, you can pick it back up. If a player knocks it out of your hands, if you drop it You are never allowed to throw your stick as a means to interfere with a play where you are too far away, or to try to prevent a scoring opportunity.

I heard if your stick breaks you must drop it. If you drop a good stick you can't pick it up unless you were in the process of shooting or passing.

Is all that true? It sounds like bad luck on your part. That would have been an ESPN worthy highlight. The one ref likely believed you had thrown your stick, which would have resulted in a minor penalty.

I don't see why that would have been a penalty shot. But, that may just be the rules of your league. The hard part about being a ref is that you have to make the "best" call you can at real speed and in the moment.

Instant replay would probably have shown your stick being knocked out of your hand inadvertently by the goal post. But the ref had to decide what he thought was right at that moment.

The bigger question is; so you stopped the initial goal. Did your goalie make the second save on the penalty shot?

I was playing center and the other team had a breakaway. As I was back checking the other team with the puck the player faked the goalie and send a soft shot around straight toward the net.

I dove forward to reach my stick forward and accross the net to block the shot. As I slid past the goal line along side of the net my stick was parallel with the goal line half in front of the net.

In the same moment the puck bounced off the blade of my stick and out of the goal and the stick came out of my hand as it struck the post.

One ref called "no goal "and the other ref called for a penalty shot. They decided on a penalty shot. What are the rules in this situation? I clearly did not throw my stick at the puck but it did come out of my hand at the moment of blocking an inevitable goal.

And your ironic prediction of getting beat first round of the post season is quite common for Presidents Trophy winners.

There seems to be a curse with owning the best record. Player 1 gets out at His team is still short 2 skaters. So does he have to wait for a stopage in play to return?

Otherwise it would be too many men on the ice. I know that you cant have less than 3 skaters on the ice. I was just curious how the timing worked.

Thank you. Season is half over and no loss. They'll get bounced in the first round. A team will always have the ability to put 3 players and a goalie on the ice, no matter how many players are sitting in the box.

Every player from a given team can sit in the box at the same time and it would not change how many players can skate free. The trick to these situations is to understand how the clock works during such an occurrence.

It once was and there have been some rule changes to this in recent years causing confusion that if more then 2 players from the same team were in the box serving penalties, only 2 of the penalty timers would reduce as the game was being played.

This would result in the third player sitting in the box to have a longer penalty wait time, as he would not see any time reduce from his timer until the first penalty expired.

Player 3 would have sat for instead of only because 2 penalty timers can run at the same time. I will have to confirm this, but that is what I remember.

Just know, you can put more in the box then just 2. What happens when a team has two players in the penalty box and a player on the short handed team commits another penalty?

Let's assume all of these are minor penalties. Go Hawks! Absolutely enjoy the writing you've given the internet. I have added your site to my bookmarks.

Looking forward to your next blog. WebWatcher Now if u want to guest write my site. I typically see a coach move players from one side to another, or one position to another to help that player or line get a spark.

When that fails, often the player gets put back to the minors to build skills again. OV switched from left to right as Oates has been moving lines around.

OV and Backstrom were the dynamic duo for years. Now they are on different lines. Coaches make moves to see how team chemistry can be improved.

I played a game last night where the officials did not know some of the rules. It was ok though since they put their whistles away, and just let us play.

But still, there are enough grey areas in hockey at every level. It is funny to see how many people who know a lot but still do not know everything.

I am included in that statement. Thanks for reading Steve. Thanks this was a good read, I can think of a few people at our local arena who sit near me that could learn from reading this.

Maybe one or two of the officials too :. Opinion is hard to prove, disprove, believe, or disbelieve. You will either agree with me, or want to argue with me.

The beautiful thing about opinions is that I can believe anything, and it should not matter to anyone else, and the inverse is true.

To be fair, and to answer your questions about my opinion, I think Bettman has a hard job. He has to tell hundreds of players and owners combined what the league is going to do, how it is going to protect agreements, contracts, safety, and other concerns that individuals and groups are going to have each year.

If he makes one decision, one portion of the group will approve, and the other will disapprove. The opposite would be true if he decided in favor the other way.

That example pretty much is only in binary yes and no type answers or problems. Now compound that with more "answers" then just Yes or No Bettman has his belief of how the NHL would best prosper, earn money, draw in new fans, and develop future players.

One choice could ruin countless hours of effort whereas sticking to a difficult decision now could create a positive culture in 5 years.

I often compare management to parenting. Decisions are not always popular. And they are not always seen as "the right way" for something to be done.

But someone must make that decision. Not all kids respect their parents. Not every player, coach, owner, and fan respect Bettman.

But he is making harder then I have to make. I am glad it is not me. I can guarantee that I would have countless people mad at me if I were the commissioner of anything.

I think hockey is still fun to watch. He is not doing bad. All sides wanted to be paid fair according to what they believed would be fair.

They also wanted to make sure a great many other things as well. So, Bettman, I am ok with him making hard choices and sticking with them. Fan growth is basically why there was a lockout to begin with.

On to 2; I would not be commissioner, ever. As I mentioned before, there are too many things to protect. So, lets say I make a choice to force salary cuts, or ticket price caps, or new rules to improve safety, or any other element of the game.

As one element changes, it will affect some other area. Change in player pay will cause tickets to go up. Forcing tickets to go down in price will give owners less to pay for high powered players.

Changing rules happen, but they are always years in debate with owners. But these tend to have the least amount of influence to team mechanics.

However, referees tend to have a learning curve to adoption of how new rules are called. But to give you as straight an answer as I can, I would change nothing without knowing more about what is happening under the hood of the league that I do not already know.

The uninformed can always judge based on what they know. But we, the uninformed should always be ready to consider that we don't know enough.

We can have our opinions, but they will always be missing something. They will always be flawed. Again, I am not envious of anyone who has to keep so many groups of people who don't want to work together happy.

Can you briefly explain why every seems to hate him besides the obvious involvement in a pair of lockouts , and how deserved do you think his reputation is?

Welcome back. The shortened season is so young it is hard to comment on a new coach trying to get a team to adopt his system.

Oates is one of the most talented capitals in franchise history. As a fan, I would love to see him be a brilliant coach as well. OV has a very specific skill set.

He hits hard, moves fast, and plays how he learned how to play. I have seen him try different things over the years. Coaches don't always know how to play him.

Coaches often have a hard time playing someone on their roster. I don't think Ovechkin can't learn to play different.

I don't think he has not played different. His high power, no hold back attitude is what got him noticed. That got shut down, and he slowed down.

It would be hard for anyone to take their style that got them noticed and be forced to make it better. Isn't that what makes us human? The ability to adapt to trials, to try to make ourselves better.

Sometimes this is harder then it looks. I am not even close enough to pro level to compare myself to even a bench player who spends most of the season in development leagues.

But I know I have no room to judge someone else who can stick handle circles around almost every other player, out hit most other players, and shoot a puck from just about any angle and still make a goalie worry if they are going to stop his shot.

Sure, he does not make headlines like in Phoenix where he scored on his back with the tip of his stick. Sure he has not had back to back 50 goal seasons for a few years.

I still like to watch him score. He gets bad reviews because someone has compared him to other players. He still goes out and does not miss a game.

He plays hard. I don't know anyone who likes to lose. I must respect him because I could not do any better.

Is he worth what his team and fans are paying for him to be in Washington? I don't know. I am glad I don't have to answer that question with a paycheck.

But as a fan, I still let my neighbors know when he and any other Capital scores a goal. I have wondered how many neighbors down can hear my yell when Washington scores.

I was last on here 9 months ago I'm back! Great to see you're still answering these, and hope all is well. So, I'm just getting into the current NHL season.

I watched the Penguins-Caps game on Sunday and yes, I am asking yet another question about Washington. During one of the period breaks, either Jones or Milbury was saying that the reason Ovie has slumped overall is because he doesn't evolve his game; i.

And, 2 What is your assessment of Adam Oates as the coach so far? I know this is a Hockey Basics hub but I'm sure your responses will be enlightening for all, not just Caps fans Thanks for the insight as always!

This article along with nearly every comment up until March has been published for kindle and nook devices. I would love any support from readers who want to keep a copy digitally for themselves.

Players are allowed to be in the crease, as well as play the puck in the crease. The only really big rule about crease violation is that a player can't interfere with the goaltender.

In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.

The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee s , and not by means of video replay or review.

Justin, sorry about the long winded quote from the NHL Rulebook. In short, as it says towards the beginning of the quote, a goal can be allowed even if a player was standing in the crease.

But it will be disallowed if that player caused the goaltender from being able to move freely. On a side note, some other leagues have differing rules.

Such as amateur leagues have a crease violation rule where any opposing player that enters the crease on his own power and not forced by the defense will cause a stoppage of play, and a resulting face-off out in the neutral zone.

This post is in error. It is rule 67 that was altered. Rule 76, Handeling the puck- players who cover the puck with the intent to hide the puck from opposing players will be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.

In addition, if the face off player pushes the puck with his hands to clear the face off circle, this will also be assessed a 2 minute minor penalty for delay of game.

Your logic is dizzying. But if that makes sense to you, I can't argue your belief and your conclusions. Live long, and prosper, and may the force be with you.

As for the "trick" question. I am not sure I am even reading the question right. What percent of the open net is needed to score?

Well, I have seen goals scored in areas that were blocked by the goalie, or from behind the net, and from weird bounces They only part of the goal that needs to be open to the puck is the part of the goal the puck is getting scored into it.

Meaning, of all of the goal mouth opening , they only part that needs to be open is the part just big enough for the puck to pass through. OK trick hockey math related question.

I dont know if u know this but there is a relativity new pro league cwhl 6 teams mostly all canadain but there is 1 team in that league outta Boston.

Chris, Girls can totally rock hockey. I play recreationally these days, and there are not too many girls, but they come out and play in our league just fine.

This season, we have the wife of our team captain on defense, and she has been the most reliable in both positioning and physically challenging the on-coming pressure from our opponents.

I watch every game I can find when it comes to watching hockey. I especially like NHL and International play.

Sadly, for women's hockey, that usually means I just get the Olympics and the occasionally televised Women's World Championships.

Sure, they don't hit like players in the NHL do, but they do hit. They also don't skate at the same speed that the NHL is played at. But if that argument were truly a concern, how is it that NCAA men's basketball is popular?

I like NCAA sports too, but anyone who argues that women's hockey of any kind at a semi-professional level is too slow, the I don't want to hear that person say they like any NCAA sport, for it is much slower then it's professional counter part.

A few years ago, my oldest daughter asked if she could learn to play hockey. I was really happy.

Then she realized the puck could get her I tried to explain that she would have on pads, and that she would not feel too much of the impact.

She however remembered that I broke my foot 3 times playing hockey by blocking shots. She does not want to play. She likes to watch it still. But I thought I had something going.

How do I feel about girls in hockey? I feel there are not enough leagues and teams fostering our young women. I would like to see a women's league that gets national attention.

The state I live in has a few traveling women's leagues, but no one knows about them. I would like to see a WNHL, but that seems pretty far off.

I totally support anyone anywhere who wants to play hockey. There should be no reason why anyone can't put a stick in their hand and play. Thank you Chris.

I hope you stay with helping your boys and girls teams. Managing and coaching teams can be a thankless activity. But if just one becomes passionate about hockey, they can spread it to others.

Good luck. Who knows, maybe your son s could be the next hockey all star generation. Oh wow thats crazy! Well thank you again for the info!

Larisa, price always varies based on age and equipment requirements. I would imagine peewee to cost a few hundred dollars as a minimum.

You can often find second hand stores to provide gloves, skates and some of the basic pads. Kids grow out of pads so fast that it may be better to just buy them used at first.

New pads could run you anywhere from to , especially as your player gets older. You will also need a chest pad, knee pads, helmet, elbow pads, gloves, and hockey pants.

I don't know the exact cost of youth pads as my children are not as enthusiastic as I am about hockey. I had to make the conscious choice not to force it.

Sigh, I can dream of them in the NHL. But they each have their own hobbies and passions. At least, I have taught them how to play hockey.

They know how to watch it. About the dangers of hockey; every competative contact sport has opportunity for injury. Hockey allows checking in some leagues, but not all.

I have yet to see a checking peewee league. I am sure there is one out there, but I have not actually seen one. I would recommend if a team does not require a full face cage, get one anyway.

Teeth cost too much to replace as a kid. The dangers in youth hockey would likely be high sticks to the face or neck, stray pucks, blocked shots which is how I have broken my foot , and inexperienced skaters accidentally hitting or skating into other players.

I find that the pads make the game incredibly safe. I have taken shots off my mask, knees, feet, and other pads.

As players start younger, they learn how to avoid danger better. I can't say there will be no risk, but I really think hockey is safer then football.

Collisions do less damage to players then being dragged down in semi-defensless positions. Football is fine, but I really think hockey is safer.

Makes perfect sence now!.. Thank you for your wonderful explanation! My family is all about football i love football Raiders! Also why is it so dangerous??

Larisa, I was very happy to see LA win last night. They deserved the win after such a strong playoff run. To your questions; a check is the physical use of force or an object to impede the play or progress of another player.

For example, a check can be applied by a player running into another. This is the most typical type of check. So, when you see two players collide, and one player caused it on purpose, he "initiated" the check.

Most are legal. However, if you recall the first period where LA's Rob Scuderi 7 was checked from behind into the boards and ended up face down on the ice bleeding for a few minutes The call on the ice was "Boarding" and was assessed a 5 minute major penalty.

During this time, LA scored 3 goals and really put the game away. There are also other types of illegal checks such as cross checking, high sticking, and tripping.

Stick checking and lifting other player's sticks are legal, but if you slash, hook, or use excessive force with your stick, you will get a penalty for it.

Basically, a check can be as simple as poking someone or as violent as running into them and causing them to go flying through the air which can be legal if done in accordance with NHL rules.

The question about when to get youth into hockey for the first time is up to the kid and parents. Many NHL players played Peewee hockey from 3 or 4 years old through high school.

If you just want your kids to be good, or to have fun playing sports, then it is never too late to get involved in hockey.

Adults pick up the sport a little slower, but they still pick it up just the same. I would caution that if you get a child hooked on playing hockey, you may be committing yourself to an expensive sport.

I will not sugar coat the cost. My gear cost me enough that I questioned playing recreationally year over year. My wife says I am happier the rest of the week after a game regardless of a win or loss.

I guess I like the stress relief hockey gives me. I taught a few friends how to ice skate and roller blade by putting a hockey stick in their hands and pulled them into pick-up games.

When a new skater is focused on chasing the puck, and has a mild crutch to lean on for balance, the feet figure out how to stay under you.

It is really easy to teach someone how to skate for the first time when they are not focused on falling, and you give them a task to chase something.

Also i want to be a hockey mom when i have my kids.. How soon should i start involving him in this sport? Also i must say my tteam LA Kings won last night which made mefall in love more with hockey!!!

Ive learned so much by you, thanks for posting all this info! My question is what do you mean by "checking" does it mean the same as in basketball?

Emily, a line is basically the group of players that play together. So the First Line, also known as the Top Line are your goal scorers and your players that may have been on the team the longest.

The First Line usually will start a game, but they do not have to. The coach can have any line start, and can play the lines in any order. Basically, during the game, the coach just wants to be able to yell to his team, "Second Line, your next" and those players know that they will jump over the boards and onto the ice when the players on the ice start coming off the ice.

We hear about lines more from commentators and fans when significant players or strategies influence these lines.

He usually plays with the same players on the Top Line, but this past year, while one of the best centers on the team was recovering, Coach Hunter tried the Second Line center and the Third Line center on the first line.

That kind of thing. Fans like to hear when the Checking Line is on the ice. It may even be fun to know who these guys are.

The checking line in Washington scores a good percent of goals each season. They work hard, but their focus is to disrupt the playing style of opposing teams.

They are out there trying to take advantage of mental mistakes from the other team. Lines really are for the coach to be able to yell who should be on the ice in as little words as possible.

Thanks so much - I starting watching NHL hockey this season, but I couldn't figure out some of the rules, and this helped a lot! I also hear the term "line" thrown around a lot: "He went from being the center on the first line to being the winger on the third," stuff like that.

What does that mean? What's a line? Each team only has one time out per game. I have never seen a team try to call a second. In NCAA Basketball, if a player tries to call a timeout after their last timeout, they get a technical foul.

But I have never seen it in hockey. I will have to look into the rules. I bet the refs just remind the team they can't take a second and then drop the puck for play to continue.

Would any official really be asked to make inaccurate calls to boost ratings? Just imagine the fallout if that ever was made public, if it were true.

Phily beating the comeback of Sidney Crosby, and the all star roster of the Pittsburgh Penguins could easily be an argument that it is not credible conspiracy.

I have seen games that made me think of these claims. But I guess I just don't want to believe in them. It would mean my passion for the game is based on a lie and a flawed system.

It would mean I have put love and time into something fabricated. I believe it is an argument brought up when inconsistent calls are made. So people start asking how calls can be made against one team but the same offense went uncalled against the other.

This question becomes a theory that there must be intent and bias towards the team that benefited from the apparently one-sided officiating.

After watching enough of any sport, a viewer will undoubtedly find enough evidence to support this theory, making it fact in their mind, even if there is evidence to prove otherwise.

I don't want to spend too long talking about the ladder of inference. You should look it up. It is really a pretty interesting concept of how people take what they see around them and define their beliefs and their actions in accordance to this data.

But in short, people come up with how they feel officiating is run based on what they have seen. And if a conclusion is formed before enough data can be collected, someone can jump to the wrong conclusion.

For me, I have seen enough games that I can understand the frustration with officiating, but I also don't agree that it is rigged by ratings hungry executives.

Nor is it setup for teams to get more home games by extending a series to 7 games. I am sure the St. Louis market would love more money, but they are a single game away from getting swept out by LA.

Last year, Washington got swept by Tampa Bay in the second round. Detroit, one of the most faithful markets to their team had to watch as Nashville eliminated them quickly this year.

If there was a city in the country that could use revenue and marketing, it would have been Detroit.

But they not only lost in the first round, but they lost quickly. Wow, you can really tell how drunk I was looking back on some of the nonsense in those last posts.

My bad After watching today's game myself and then reading some fans' reactions, I've noticed a pattern of conspiracy theories regarding the officiating in the playoffs.

It's implied that the forces that be want to keep big-ticket players and teams in it for popularity's sake.

Even as a casual fan I remember this popping up all the time in the past, too. Do you think all that talk is just sour grapes or can some fans legitimately argue that poorly-called playoff games are no accident?

Hmm, an opportunist Thanks for the effort you made in your answers, I think I'm finally getting it. I'll still be rooting for the Caps of course, and maybe Ovie will get to make some big contributions now that Hunter is giving him some time.

I really don't know why OV either can't or won't play more defense. I would speculate that he has learned that how he plays brings him success.

So I am guessing that what ever motivations he has, lack of defense has become his habit or style. I would doubt that any coach anywhere US, Canada, Russia, etc.

I play in an amateur league now, and my team is always yelling at each other to play more defense. I am curious if Alex would even answer that question straight.

When players are exposed for bad habits, sometimes they just deflect the question. After hearing some of his post game and post season interviews, he just says things like "we need to play better" or "We missed it.

I guess looking back at this comment, I remember in all sports growing up, there were always "lazier" players that would cherry pick all day, and that was it.

They were the ones at half court in basketball allowing a 5 on 4 down under basket. They were also the ones sitting on half field playing soccer.

They would have a good chance to score when the goalie could clear it out to him. In hockey, he is an opportunist. I see him the same way as a cherry picker.

But a good cherry pick play catches the defense unaware sometimes and can lead to great scoring chances. The problem is, they leave the defense stranded down a man.

And Lord knows wanting to avoid slapshots is understandable, especially after seeing how many D-men left the ice shaking their hands last night, haha Adhilde, because of how great you've been to me and others regarding timely and informative responses to our queries, and how deftly sensical your responses have been, I really respect you.

So please, please resist all present and future urges to get defensive regarding certain players or teams; not that you really have done so to this point, but to myself and others I think you're as close to an objective hockey source that we'll get, and I truly want to preserve that I still don't understand the anti-defense star culture.

It absolutely blows my mind that such a physical, results-based sport could kowtow to a "specialized" offensive skill set at the expense of effort on defense, especially when said offense isn't producing; again, it seems to me that all OV'd have to do is put forth the effort.

Not too much to ask You've admitted as much, that OV's offensive skills have been emphasized absolutely. Fair enough.

I watch the NHL analysts describing his lackluster effort on the defensive end and wait for them to slam him, and yet they don't.

Like only caring about scoring is okay in a star forward's book. Am I right in that this cultural feature stands out like a sore thumb, or is there some hard-to-define logic to it all?

I know I'm missing something here; please help I don't know why But thank you for mentioning him your post. I don't think he wants to play defense.

But I could only guess that. If it is true, then I can only guess why. Many defensive players get serious injuries blocking shots.

Someone needs to ask him. I think defense before offensive is a better strategy, unless you were the Indianapolis Colts the year they won the Super Bowl.

For every point their defense gave up, their offense would get back quickly. For every stop their defense made, the offense would still score.

So, if you have a weak defense, you better have the best offense. Don't get me wrong when I defend OV. I don't think his style of play is good for most teams.

I don't even know if it right for Dale Hunter and the Capitals. I just argue that he has not changed. He has been the same Alex Ovechkin for as long as he has played hockey.

He was celebrated for it a few years back. But now, he is seen as a liability for it. I stress, I don't know what team can really build around a player such as him, but it sucks that fans and management were completely behind him.

And now it seems like no one wants to be. Before Backstrom got hurt this year, they were a very powerful duo. Because of Backstrom's ability to pass and get the puck to Alex, they were very hard to defend against.

I don't pretend to know what is best in Washington. And, to confirm your statement, the "Wizards-era Jordan" analogy doesn't compute at all IMO, for a few reasons, but most importantly: at that point, Jordan was a legend who was holding onto his own ghost on a mediocre team out of sheer competitiveness; with the Caps, OV is in his prime and surrounded by talent.

Adhilde, thanks for your honest feedback In my past, I've quickly attached to a certain player or team when discovering a new sport based on first impressions, emphasizing obvious skill and effort; I realize that this criteria is somewhat random, yet perfect and fair in that I'm judging favs the same way a very young, new fan would: first impressions.

Again, this seems random, but I used the same mind and methodology to pick Jimmie Johnson as my favorite NASCAR driver about ten years ago, so, seeing how that worked out, I trust my sports spectator instincts.

These same instincts tell me to push you on this topic. I sympathize with your "the player hasn't changed, just expectations" argument, as it's clear even to a noob like me that Washington has accrued a lot of talent recently and Holtby has been a great, positive surprise.

But to dismantle said argument, I point to the fact that all the reluctance to sacrifice offensive breakout positioning you say OV indulges in has resulted in an underwhelming year and playoffs, goal-wise, for him.

So his one-end style hasn't paid off this year from what I gather; the offensive output hasn't been making up for the lack of defense, thus degrading his value.

I know, I know, Dale Hunter has demanded a playoff-style, defense-first approach I'm looking for a "real talk" answer: Why can't OV just play defense or, again, any other offensive star I just read all about Alexei Yashin, ugh?

If the answer is essentially "He doesn't want to," then as "a newish fan" I have a huge problem with his respectability off the bat, which would be very disappointing since WAS has been "my team" based on those newbie instincts I referenced.

If this is the case, why would a team tolerate such resistance? Please spill your mind to your heart's content, and, if you can, convince me that OV is justified in his one-sided game.

In hockey, we do have many specialized players. But none as highly paid as OV. I have seen many players sell out completely for a team.

They play hard on D, and block shots. They will hurry to help the offensive rush, but be mindful to get back on D.

I think it has been a topic of concern in Washington and across the league when a failed offensive surge ends with Ovechkin gliding back onto the Defensive side of the ice.

He has a lot of talent, there is no dispute there. I think what makes most analysts mad is that he seems to give up once the rush is over.

I have seen him in the defensive zone. When he knows that the defense is either out of position or late coming back, he steps up and defends hard.

Ovechkin has a specific style of play that boarders on reckless. I have not seen the Cup in Washington yet.

As much as I want him to play harder, if he gets too far out of his position, then he won't be ready to break out of the defensive zone.

I am not defending that he is less mindful of defense. Years ago, when he got his huge contract, people were not sure how to play against Alex.

He was too big, and too explosive. In the past 2 years, teams have really figured out how to make him less of a factor. Also, he is the captain of the team.

That is voted on by the players. Alex Ovechkin is a bit one sided when it comes to hockey. But management knew that even when they agreed to pay him a lot.

Fans loved him, especially before he got figured out. And players respected him and still do for his speed and heaving hitting.

So what has changed? Not his style. Just our expectations. We want a cup. What is funny about the whole "one dimensional" play discussion is that most defenders are not criticized for not having an offensive mindset.

I want to see Washington win, but I don't think getting all over Alex Ovechkin will make a win appear before us.

I have played hockey for so many years. I could never even come close to the skill Alex has. As a player and fan, I feel Ovechkin is getting beaten up in the media and by fans for no reason other then impatience.

Micheal Jordan went to the Wizards and could not win a championship. He is arguably the most influential and possibly the best professional basketball player ever.

So, what did people say just before he retired in Washington? Did people blame him? Now, it is a hard comparison to make, but I feel OV is playing hard.

He is playing his game. I bet he hates losing as much as the fans hate watching a loss.

Ice Hockey Rules Simplified Beschreibung

Keep Calm ain't happening Beschreibung Schach Online Spielen Ohne Anmelden Football, designed in a way you never played it Video Slots.Nl. American Football, designed in a way you never played it before. You could do something similar for all of your favorite shows sports! Pinterest Danielsmeier Werl using cookies to help give you the best experience we can. Kommt mit Umschlag. Performance improvements. Line Runner. Our signs are made on wood and have A1 Slots Website imperfections. Made of game used hockey sticks, its a great way to recycle and add a touch of class to any room. The theme of this room is to replicate an Land Casino Arena. This basic guide for rules in Pc Spiele Demos NHL covers everything from the field of play to stoppages and penalties. Lock Down Michael Morris Taschenbuch deutsch No assembly required; table arrives fully built. Erfordert iOS Line Runner. Ice Hockey Rules Simplified How does all that swapping back and forth work? An ice hockey team is made up of six players, each with a specific position and job. Sweden Casino a wing passing back to Tv Programm Pdf inattentive defenseman accidentally scores on them selves while their goalie is out of the net, that goal will count even if the team getting the point was about to go into the penalty box. It is good to have a full season again. Your game Lizenz Bedeutung improve and the fast-paced icy rink sport will start to make sense. When players get too far over the line, the league suspends them. Tricks Bei Sportwetten it! Contact us for custom. Choose your favorite football team and rank up while playing various seasons, cups in spectacular stadiums or simple dominate in a quick game or future football style matches. Capture the true spirit of hockey Double Down Black Jack this 5 x 7 picture frame! Just put on the glass! A good Zamboni driver can do one lap of a rink in 60 Jezt Spielen. Funny Hockey Goalie Sayings will keep hockey goalies inspired. Size measures 55 inches wide x 24 inches high. Its a known fact that every NHL player gets one of these from […]. Meistverkauft in Sachbücher.

1 Replies to “Ice Hockey Rules Simplified”

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *